Current status

Stage

Pre-first paid engagement. We do not have a satisfied customer yet — our bar is a completed paid engagement, referenceable, would rehire. First engaged client and first satisfied customer are likely June 2026; an engagement may start sooner. We have not completed a sales call yet as of this update.

The public site is in a beta pass — copy and layout may move; About is the stable anchor for who we are.

What we offer

A mix of consulting / systems architecture and practitioner-facing tools. Consulting drives what we build. We open-source what is not proprietary; proprietary delivery carries a different economics.

Tools (today)

• Vendor ToS lens — work in progress: a filterable comparison view of vendor terms and privacy policies, with sourced excerpts grouped by product family (e.g. Cursor vs Antigravity vs Claude), full URL/date references, and tracking when clauses drift over time. Not legal advice.
• Plan A — single-machine privileged-adjacent drafting loop: local inference on a designated host, approved corpora only, no cloud-model bleed on that path. Working demo; Local drafting loop (May 2026) — also on Media · Blogs.

Community & field presence

We are attending legal-AI and practitioner community events — not hosting our own meetup series yet. See Locations and Showing up.

Rocky Mountain Legal AI (RM Legal AI subgroup of RMAIIG) — we’re in the ecosystem around their programming (including the May 29 lunch series at Rule4). We’ve emailed about a complementary working session — distinct from their speaker/education format — that would take real practitioner needs and turn around concrete solutions alongside their events. Organizer support and timing are TBD; if you want to see that happen, ping the organizers or reach us and we’ll help connect it.

How people find us

• RM Legal AI / RMAIIG ecosystem — Rocky Mountain Legal AI calendar
• CTO Lunches and related practitioner forums
• Colorado university business school — exploratory practitioner collaboration; details being finalized
• CU Computer Science and Silicon Flatirons — planned next; outreach not yet opened
• AI skeptic? listen sessions — live on site; no signups yet

Partnerships & pipeline (WIP)

Nothing below is signed unless we say so explicitly:

• Clio and Harvey — evaluating public affiliate and developer partnership programs this week
• Boulder co-build partner — long-tenured local shop for mission-critical software (relationship- and results-driven delivery; public case work spans defense, environmental data, and commercial platforms); PAP-shaped pilot alignment in mutual MNDA stage, not signed
• West-coast agentic engineering firm — San Diego (automation, integrations, shipped client systems); technical conversation scheduled — exploratory

Delivery capacity

Steve handles delivery today. Engineering and integration partnerships are in discussion and will scale with signed work — we do not claim a locked bench until agreements exist.

Early aligned firms

We are especially keen to work with a small number of early aligned firms under preferential terms while our reference base is still building — when the value prop and fit are already mutual, by conversation, not a public coupon or countdown. If that might be you, book a call.

Path to track record

When we earn a satisfied customer, we will ask for quote, logo, or anonymized case study as appropriate. Until then we will not publish client counts, logos, revenue, or implied engagements we cannot stand behind.

What’s next

Dialing in on the state of legal tools and where practitioners are stuck — there are no perfect solutions on the market today. More Plan A field notes, first paid work, tighter public copy as the beta pass lands. We are reviewing practice-management vendor material internally (Filevine among others); nothing to cite publicly until that review lands.